Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBerkman, Nancy D
dc.contributor.authorWallace, Ina F
dc.contributor.authorSteiner, Michael J
dc.contributor.authorHarrison, Melody
dc.contributor.authorGreenblatt, Amy M
dc.contributor.authorLohr, Kathleen N
dc.contributor.authorKimple, Adam
dc.contributor.authorYuen, Andrea
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-06T21:25:19Z
dc.date.available2020-08-06T21:25:19Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.urihttps://digital.bibliotecaorl.org.br/handle/forl/317
dc.description.abstractTo compare benefits and harms of strategies currently in use for managing otitis media with effusion (OME). Treatment for OME may include single approaches alone or combinations of two or more approaches. We compared benefits and harms among these treatments: tympanostomy tubes (TT), myringotomy (myr), adenoidectomy (adenoid), autoinflation (auto), oral or nasal steroids, complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), and watchful waiting (WW). We included comparisons of treatment effectiveness in subgroups of patients with OME, and whether outcome differences were related to factors affecting health care delivery or the receipt of pneumococcal vaccine inoculation.
dc.publisherAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US)
dc.rightsAberto
dc.source.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK143306/
dc.subjectOtitis Mediaen
dc.subjectOtitis Media with Effusionen
dc.subjectOtite Médiapt_BR
dc.subjectOtite Média com Derramept_BR
dc.titleOtitis Media With Effusion: Comparative Effectiveness of Treatments
dc.typeEbook


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record