Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorArroyo-Ramos, Helena Hotzen
dc.contributor.authorNeri, Larissaen
dc.contributor.authorMancini, Marilia Wellichanen
dc.contributor.authorDuarte Neto, Amaro Nunesen
dc.contributor.authorMauad, Thaisen
dc.contributor.authorImamura, Ruien
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-14T13:50:41Z
dc.date.available2020-09-14T13:50:41Z
dc.date.issued2019-05
dc.identifier.citationArroyo-Ramos HH, Neri L, Mancini MW, Neto AND, Mauad T, Imamura R. Effects of diode laser setting for laryngeal surgery in a rabbit model. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 May;276(5):1431-1438. doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05344-5.en
dc.identifier.other10.1007/s00405-019-05344-5
dc.identifier.urihttp://digital.bibliotecaorl.org.br/handle/forl/428
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: To study the damaging effect of different diode laser settings on vocal folds 7 days after injury in a rabbit model. METHODS: Twenty-one male New Zealand white rabbits were randomized into three groups with seven animals per group. A 980-nm diode laser was used to create a single spot injury in each vocal fold. Different modulation frequencies (10 Hz versus 1000 Hz) in pulsed mode, different powers (3 W versus 5 W), and distinct wave modes of radiation (pulsed versus continuous) were compared. RESULTS: The extent of the inflammatory infiltrate and ablation crater were greater when using 5-W optical power compared with 3 W. The extent and depth of the inflammatory infiltrate, and the width and depth of the ablation crater were greater with continuous wave mode compared with pulsed mode. The density of collagen fibers only increased when using the laser in continuous wave mode. CONCLUSION: The use of the 980-nm diode laser with an output power of 5 W produced an increased extent of thermal injury compared to an output power of 3 W and, more importantly, using continuous rather than pulsed wave mode significantly increased the extent and depth of thermal injury in rabbit vocal folds.en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherEur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 May;276(5):1431-1438. doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05344-5.
dc.source.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05344-5
dc.subjectLarynxen
dc.subjectVocal folden
dc.subjectLaser injuryen
dc.subjectWound healingen
dc.subjectDiode laseren
dc.subjectEndolaryngeal surgeryen
dc.titleEffects of diode laser setting for laryngeal surgery in a rabbit modelen
dc.title.alternativeEur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 May;276(5):1431-1438. doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05344-5.en
dc.typeArtigoen


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record