Digital Library ORL
    • English
    • português (Brasil)
    Acesse:
  • Biblioteca Acervo Físico
  • Fundação Otorrinolaringologia
  • Otorrinolaringologia USP
  • English 
    • English
    • português (Brasil)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • Outros
  • Artigo
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • Outros
  • Artigo
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of DSpaceKnowledge AreasAuthorsAdvisorsTitlesSubjectsBy Issue DateRecent Submissions
This CollectionAuthorsAdvisorsTitlesSubjectsBy Issue DateRecent Submissions

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Influence of international authorship on citations in Brazilian medical journals: a bibliometric analysis

ThumbnailView/Open
Date
2019-06
Author
Montefusco, Adilson Marcos
Author
Nascimento, Felipe Parra do
Author
Sennes, Luiz Ubirajara
Author
Bento, Ricardo Ferreira
Author
Imamura, Rui
xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-type
Artigo
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
The challenge of increasing the impact of regional journals has received much attention. While funding and research agencies require the acceptance of papers from foreign authors as a means of increasing citations, Brazilian journal editors dispute the impact of this measure. This study aimed to evaluate, for Brazilian medical journals, whether the number of citations a document received was influenced by the authors’ institutional affiliations or other predictive factors related to the paper or the journal. Sixty-one medical journals published in Brazil in 2012 were selected for analysis. SCImago and Scopus were used to extract the articles and their data. The number of citations a document received in 5 years was analyzed according to the authors’ affiliations, language, document type, SCImago Cites per Document, and journal subject category. After adjusting for covariates by multivariate analysis, documents with collaborative international affiliations showed a citation increase of 0.17 (95% CI: 0.084–0.216) over documents by Brazilian authors. Significant increases in citations were also observed for bilingual documents (0.329; 95% CI: 0.236–0.380), English-only documents (0.159; 95% CI: 0.078–0.203), articles (1.590; 95% CI: 1.363–1.714), reviews (2.752; 95% CI: 2.355–2.972), and those under the subject category of hematology (1.280; 95% CI: 0.756–1.604). In summary, while collaborative international authorship increased citations in the investigated journals, language, type of document, and subject category had a stronger impact on the number of citations.
xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-title-alternative
Scientometrics. 2019 June;119(3)1487–96. doi: 10.1007/s11192-019-03104-0.
xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-source-uri
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03104-0
Subject
Bibliometrics
 
Citation analysis
 
Scopus
 
International visibility
 
International cooperation
 
Science evaluation
 
URI
http://digital.bibliotecaorl.org.br/handle/forl/424
Collections
  • Artigo [1]

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Divisão de Biblioteca e Documentação do Departamento
de Otorrinolaringologia da Faculdade de Medicina USP

Rua Artur de Azevedo, 46 CEP: 05404-000 São Paulo/SP - Brasil

Tel: (11) 3062-4097 Email: biblioteca@forl.org.br

Medicina USPFORL
Desenvolvido por Logo DGL Sistemas
 

 


Contact Us | Send Feedback

Divisão de Biblioteca e Documentação do Departamento
de Otorrinolaringologia da Faculdade de Medicina USP

Rua Artur de Azevedo, 46 CEP: 05404-000 São Paulo/SP - Brasil

Tel: (11) 3062-4097 Email: biblioteca@forl.org.br

Medicina USPFORL
Desenvolvido por Logo DGL Sistemas